to ITC home page

back to project index

This site is now an archive. Please visit us at the Centre for Social Informatics (September 2011)

skip to navigation

EDEN - Electronic Democracy European Network

The rationale for the EDEN project was tied to that of the EU applied research programme in Information Society Technologies, IST, and to the view that online information on decision-making leads to greater transparency in governance, as a pre-requisite for online consultation and participation.

EDEN deployed capabilities in computational linguistics, expressed in Natural Language Processing (NLP) modules that provided the building blocks of a web-based 'toolkit'. Integrated into the existing technical and social infrastructure represented by the participating city administrations' websites, its purpose was to address certain techno-political issues that are commonly used as the basis of 'e-democracy' experiments. Citizens in most European states are often seen as disconnected from the administrations that govern them, or participate in the politics of planning decisions only when 'options' have already become 'facts'. This may be partly attributed to the remoteness and opacity of decision-making and the incomprehensibility of related planning documents.

The assumed infrastructure for e-democracy on the other hand is one in which public investment in city-wide Intranets or civic networks holds the promise of near ubiquitous access from home, public terminals or mobile handsets. Access, it is hoped, for purposes that include making enquiries, having these responded to competently, and engaging in conversations on issues identified by others interested in planning. So in broad terms the needs for EDEN were articulated in terms of improvements in access, comprehension, and navigation of decision-making procedures that allow citizens to influence planning. These were thought to lead to greater participation in planning and acceptance of the process by the 'ordinary citizen'. Evaluating the toolkit involved investigating whether and how these benefits were realised.

You can find more general information about ITC's role in EDEN from the evaluation summary here in PDF format (610 Kb, opens in a new window).

back to the top

How were user requirements investigated?

ITC collaborated with the research partners in each city to establish what was wanted from the EDEN toolkit. We used a hybrid of Soft Systems Methodology and Scenario-based methods to answer these questions:

  1. What communication activities relating to urban planning could the EDEN toolkit support?
  2. How are those activities currently carried out, by which 'actors' and groups of citizens, and using what media?
  3. Why should those activities be enhanced using EDEN technology, in terms of the PA's objectives for their urban planning activities and e-democracy generally?
  4. What are the perceptions of the toolkit's intended users regarding what it can do that is practical and desirable, given these broader goals?
  5. What are the PA's priorities for developing the toolkit, given our increased knowledge of the intended users' perceptions?
  6. What organisational or cultural issues may affect deployment and require training or awareness-raising?
  7. What key success criteria should the toolkit prototype be evaluated against?

The User Requirements report EDEN Deliverable 2.2 can be downloaded here in PDF format (543kb)

back to the top

So what will the tools do?

The modules that will be most visible to users are as follows:

back to the top

How was the toolkit evaluated?

User panels were recruited early in 2002, comprising ordinary citizens, members of interest groups, administration officials, and planning professionals such as architects. The user panels in each of the 4 pilot sites (Antwerp, Bologna, Bremen and Vienna) helped us to refine the evaluation criteria and better understand the scope of the problems that the EDEN toolkit is meant to address.

As the tools became available the panels gave their views on how well they met the criteria, as did users of the tools in online questionnaires. The pilots provided samples of communication between citizens and administration that were used to assess how well the needs of each were met.

back to the top

Partners

EDEN was a collaborative project with local authorities: Bologna, Antwerp, Bremen, Nisko, Vienna, along with the Osvaldo Piacentini Archive in Bologna. Our research partners were: Omega Generation, Public Voice Lab (PVL), Telepolis Antwerpen, TZI - the Center for Computing Technology at the University of Bremen, and Yana Research.

Links on this website

Partners:

Publications:

Each publication is linked to its reference

News:

back to project index
back to the top